|
ewok20t3
|
 |
« Reply #120 on: January 31, 2010, 06:31:00 PM » |
|
(I would worry about my psychological health if I did in some instances).
Haha, I worry about people who listen to Cannibal Corpse, Gwar, and Pig Destroyer because they relate so strongly to it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
murlough23
|
 |
« Reply #121 on: January 31, 2010, 06:32:49 PM » |
|
Relating to something doesn't mean I feel the way the songwriter or the character in a song feels. It just means that I can understand the feeling that's being expressed. This description obviously doesn't apply when a song is more about the sound of words or something abstract, but what isn't spoken can often still match my "mood".
I've found that the things I respect most artistically tend to line up with my favorites as well, but being that there's great art that appeals to me on a personal level and great art that doesn't, I'll generally give the first option the advantage.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ewok20t3
|
 |
« Reply #122 on: January 31, 2010, 06:57:49 PM » |
|
Relating to something doesn't mean I feel the way the songwriter or the character in a song feels. It just means that I can understand the feeling that's being expressed. This description obviously doesn't apply when a song is more about the sound of words or something abstract, but what isn't spoken can often still match my "mood".
Good point. I think it's the same for me, otherwise I probably wouldn't enjoy Explosions In The Sky as much as I do. I probably do still tend to favor music that I relate to personally more than music where I relate to the artist's expression of his feelings. For example, Jimmy Eat World's Futures is number 6 on my list while Bleed American is number 49. They're both on pretty close to the same level artistically ( Bleed American might have a slight edge). I relate to the feelings and emotions expressed in both albums pretty well. So what makes Futures rank so much higher for me? It's probably the fact that "23" helped me realize I needed to make a move on the woman that is now my wife. It's that I have a been in a relationship with a co-worker that ended up being a horrible idea, therefore I relate to the song "Work". Instances like that seem to cause me to like an album more. But albums I relate to on that big of personal level only come around once or twice a year, so other albums fall into place by how well the artist is expressing their feelings and emotions to give me a connection. That's how Bleed American ends up on my list. I do relate to it, but I don't have the kind of personal relation to it that I have to Futures. I hope that makes some kind of sense. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
murlough23
|
 |
« Reply #123 on: January 31, 2010, 07:29:26 PM » |
|
There are several songs that might otherwise be artistically unremarkable, which stick with me for similar reasons. They were in the right place at the same time. They do usually express the situation in a more interesting way than your generically written pop song, which also seems to be the case with the JEW songs you cited. (I wanted "23" to be one of my favorite songs by them. It's my favorite number. But with JEW I tend to go with the obvious picks like "The Middle" or "Pain". Then again, I both relate to "Drugs or Me" and find it artistically pleasing, and no, I've never taken drugs.)
A lot of the songs I put on mix CDs for myself are because they relate to my life situation at the time. Though some are just fun, and there are plenty of cases where well-written breakup songs made the cut despite the CD being made at a time when I was happy in a relationship (and later on, in marriage).
NP: "Hope on Fire (live)", Vienna Teng
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ewok20t3
|
 |
« Reply #124 on: January 31, 2010, 07:37:25 PM » |
|
A lot of the songs I put on mix CDs for myself are because they relate to my life situation at the time.
Yeah, that's probably the best way to have a collection of songs that mean something personal to you. Which is why when an album comes along full of songs that I relate to in that way, it makes that album so special to me.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
plvarona
|
 |
« Reply #125 on: February 03, 2010, 11:27:37 PM » |
|
I've finally settled on my "Favorite Albums of the 2000s" list. I'll go ahead and start revealing it now. I'll be revealing my list in segments, and just keep editing this post as I unveil more of my list.
Phil's Top 100 Albums of the 2000s: 100. The Evan Anthem: Sens 99. The Normals: Coming To Life 98. Robert Randolph & The Family Band: Unclassified 97. Jars of Clay: The Long Fall Back to Earth 96. John Reuben: The Boy vs. The Cynic 95. PfR: Disappear 94. Eisley: Combinations 93. The Myriad: You Can't Trust a Ladder 92. John Reuben: Word of Mouth 91. Leigh Nash: Blue on Blue 90. Inside The Outside: Inside The Outside 89. Flogging Molly: Float 88. Switchfoot: Nothing is Sound 87. Fair: The Best Worst-Case Scenario 86. NEEDTOBREATHE: The Outsiders 85. Daily Planet: Hero 84. Jars of Clay: Redemption Songs 83. The Normals: A Place Where You Belong 82. Alli Rogers: The Day of Small Things 81. Andrew Peterson: Resurrection Letters, Vol. II 80. The Elms: The Chess Hotel 79. Paper Route: Absence 78. Matthew Perryman Jones: Swallow The Sea 77. Mars ILL: Pro*Pain 76. Fleet Foxes: Fleet Foxes 75. The Violet Burning: Drop-dead 74. Seabird: Rocks Into Rivers 73. Andrew Osenga: The Morning 72. Anberlin: Never Take Friendship Personal 71. Wavorly: Conquering The Fear of Flight 70. Nichole Nordeman: This Mystery 69. Bethany Dillon: Bethany Dillon 68. Caedmon's Call: Overdressed 67. Derek Webb: The Ringing Bell 66. Relient K: Forget and Not Slow Down 65. Sleeping at Last: Storyboards 64. Derek Webb: I See Things Upside Down 63. Lifehouse: No Name Face 62. David Crowder Band: A Collision 61. Anberlin: Blueprints For the BlackMarket 60. Rebecca St. James: Transform 59. Eisley: Room Noises 58. Jennifer Knapp: The Way I Am 57. Doves: Kingdom of Rust 56. Jon Foreman: Spring and Summer EPs 55. David Crowder Band: Church Music 54. Over The Rhine: Drunkard's Prayer 53. Copeland: Eat. Sleep. Repeat. 52. The Pool Boys: My Time Alive 51. Kevin Max: The Imposter 50. Coldplay: Viva La Vida or Death and All His Friends 49. Relient K: mmhmm 48. Caedmon's Call: Long Line of Leavers 47. downhere: Ending is Beginning 46. Justin McRoberts: Deconstruction 45. Sixpence None The Richer: Divine Discontent 44. The Listening: The Rock N' Roll Worship Circus Becomes ... The Listening 43. Shaun Groves: Invitation to Eavesdrop 42. Switchfoot: Hello Hurricane 41. Derek Webb: She Must and Shall Go Free 40. Thrice: Vheissu 39. Nichole Nordeman: Woven and Spun 38. Switchfoot: Learning to Breathe 37. Jars of Clay: Who We Are Instead 36. Edison Glass: A Burn or a Shiver 35. Brooke Waggoner: Heal For The Honey 34. Jill Paquette: Jill Paquette 33. Andrew Peterson: Carried Along 32. Mute Math: Mute Math 31. Shaun Groves: Twilight 30. Sufjan Stevens: Michigan 29. Switchfoot: Oh! Gravity. 28. The Reign of Kindo: Rhythm, Chord & Melody 27. Shaun Groves: White Flag 26. Edison Glass: Time is Fiction 25. Patty Griffin: Children Running Through 24. Deas Vail: All The Houses Look The Same 23. Jars of Clay: The Eleventh Hour 22. The Myriad: With Arrows, With Poise 21. Deas Vail: Birds and Cages 20. Anberlin: Cities 19. mewithoutYou: It's All Crazy! It's All False! It's All a Dream! It's Alright 18. Cool Hand Luke: The Fires of Life 17. Andrew Peterson: The Far Country 16. Monarch: Lowly 15. Sleeping at Last: Ghosts 14. Steven Delopoulos: Me Died Blue 13. Cool Hand Luke: The Sleeping House 12. Derek Webb: Stockholm Syndrome 11. Iron and Wine: The Shepherd's Dog 10. Mae: The Everglow 09. Justin McRoberts: Grace Must Wound... 08. House of Heroes: The End is Not The End 07. Caedmon's Call: Share The Well 06. Switchfoot: The Beautiful Letdown 05. Steven Delopoulos: Straightjacket 04. Over The Rhine: The Trumpet Child 03. Sufjan Stevens: Illinois 02: Sleeping at Last:Keep No Score 01. Jars of Clay: Good Monsters
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 14, 2010, 10:43:55 PM by plvarona »
|
Logged
|
- Phil V.  My current pub songs: Andrew Peterson: "The Reckoning (How Long)" (from Counting Stars) Jars of Clay: "Out of My Hands" (from an upcoming release) The Mynabirds: "Numbers Don't Lie" (from What We Lose in the Fire We Gain in the Flood)
|
|
|
|
murlough23
|
 |
« Reply #126 on: February 04, 2010, 12:12:10 AM » |
|
Jars of Clay: The Long Fall Back to Earth Eisley: Combinations John Reuben: Word of Mouth Switchfoot: Nothing is Sound Jars of Clay: Redemption Songs The Normals: A Place Where You Belong
We have these in common so far.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
plvarona
|
 |
« Reply #127 on: February 12, 2010, 04:38:23 PM » |
|
^Actually, I scrolled through your list recently, and we have quite a few albums in common. Furthermore, I saw several albums that you had ranked in roughly the same range I did.
As for the rest of my list, albums #20-#11 will be revealed tomorrow, and I will finally reveal my top 10 on Sunday.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
- Phil V.  My current pub songs: Andrew Peterson: "The Reckoning (How Long)" (from Counting Stars) Jars of Clay: "Out of My Hands" (from an upcoming release) The Mynabirds: "Numbers Don't Lie" (from What We Lose in the Fire We Gain in the Flood)
|
|
|
|
ewok20t3
|
 |
« Reply #128 on: February 12, 2010, 06:58:16 PM » |
|
24. Deas Vail: All The Houses Look The Same 21. Deas Vail: Birds and Cages
I find this interesting because I LOVE All The Houses Look The Same but I was extremely let down with Birds and Cages. I know it took them almost three years to get the album out, but it still seems rushed or incomplete to me.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 12, 2010, 07:05:16 PM by ewok20t3 »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
murlough23
|
 |
« Reply #129 on: February 12, 2010, 07:02:25 PM » |
|
I find this interesting because I LOVE All The Houses The Same but I was extremely let down with Birds and Cages. I know it took them almost three years to get the album out, but it still seems rushed or incomplete to me.
I found B&C to only be a slight step down from their first album, but still incredibly solid. The first album just had highlights that seemed almost impossible to top.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ewok20t3
|
 |
« Reply #130 on: February 12, 2010, 07:15:17 PM » |
|
The first album just had highlights that seemed almost impossible to top.
I think that's the root of my problem with B&C. It's obvious from the previous album that they can write almost a full album of standout songs, so it disappoints me that unless I'm listening to B&C, I can't tell you anything about it that stands out. Maybe I need more time with it. I just kind of expected it to hit me within a few listens like All The Houses Look The Same did for me.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 12, 2010, 07:30:45 PM by ewok20t3 »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
murlough23
|
 |
« Reply #131 on: February 12, 2010, 07:23:16 PM » |
|
I think that's the root of my problem with B&C. It's obvious from the previous album that they can write almost a full album of standout songs, so it disappoints me that unless I'm listening to B&C, I can't tell you anything about it that stands out. Maybe I need more time with it. I just kind of expected it hit me within a few listens like All The Houses Look The Same did for me.
All the Houses was almost wall-to-wall highlights for me. You could go down to my #5 or #6 favorite on that album and I'd still be like "Wow, AMAZING song." I figure that's like lightning striking. Most albums, I get excited about a few songs, and if the rest are "pretty good", I'm satisfied. On Birds & Cages, the big ones for me are the two title tracks and "Sunlight". All of them took a few listens to fully stand out to me, because Deas Vail has this habit or morphing the structure of a song over the course of a song, which means I might remember a verse or chorus and not trace it back to the song it belonged to at first. However, I still think all the other tracks range from good to great, with maybe one or two seeming a little too convoluted to fully measure up to the high bar that the band has set. It's a slight disappointment if it registers as a disappointment at all. But I'm still discovering more about this album as I dig deeper into the songwriting. I want to review it soon, but it's going to be a challenging review to write.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ewok20t3
|
 |
« Reply #132 on: February 12, 2010, 07:40:02 PM » |
|
All of them took a few listens to fully stand out to me
I'm sure I need to let the album sink in a little more. I have a bad habit of only listening to an album a few times and then forgetting about it if it doesn't do much for me at first.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
murlough23
|
 |
« Reply #133 on: February 12, 2010, 09:15:25 PM » |
|
I'm sure I need to let the album sink in a little more. I have a bad habit of only listening to an album a few times and then forgetting about it if it doesn't do much for me at first.
I would have missed out on so many of my favorites (possibly including the first Deas Vail album) if I did that.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ewok20t3
|
 |
« Reply #134 on: February 13, 2010, 09:15:47 AM » |
|
I would have missed out on so many of my favorites (possibly including the first Deas Vail album) if I did that.
I buy more music than I have time to digest, so I don't know any other way to do it. I used to not be that way, but I can no longer wear headphones at work and that used bookstore opened up near me about two years and I go in there and buy around 10 albums a week. Between that and new releases I end up with more music to listen than I have time to listen. On top of that, I like to listen to playlists and old favorites at times, too. I'm open to suggestions on how to fix this problem if anyone has any. 
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 13, 2010, 09:37:06 AM by ewok20t3 »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
murlough23
|
 |
« Reply #135 on: February 13, 2010, 10:32:37 AM » |
|
Buy less music. You'll waste less money on stuff you don't really listen to, and get more value for the money you do spend. Better to listen deeply to a few things than shallowly to many.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ewok20t3
|
 |
« Reply #136 on: February 13, 2010, 10:46:46 AM » |
|
Buy less music. You'll waste less money on stuff you don't really listen to, and get more value for the money you do spend. Better to listen deeply to a few things than shallowly to many.
The thought of missing out on what could be a favorite album makes me anxious, though.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
murlough23
|
 |
« Reply #137 on: February 13, 2010, 10:48:48 AM » |
|
The thought of missing out on what could be a favorite album makes me anxious, though.
But you're spending money on them and still potentially missing out on them. Seems better to miss out by saving money, doesn't it?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ewok20t3
|
 |
« Reply #138 on: February 13, 2010, 10:54:18 AM » |
|
But you're spending money on them and still potentially missing out on them. Seems better to miss out by saving money, doesn't it?
Yeah, you're probably right, but 80% of my purchases come from the dollar bin and it's really hard not to buy something for a dollar that I could potentially love.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
murlough23
|
 |
« Reply #139 on: February 13, 2010, 08:24:35 PM » |
|
Yeah, you're probably right, but 80% of my purchases come from the dollar bin and it's really hard not to buy something for a dollar that I could potentially love.
Try this. If after 2-3 listens, something isn't grabbing you and you have reason to expect it to grab you based on the artist's past performance, post here and ask others what they like about it. That might give you a few tracks to zero in on. Of course, we won't all agree here, and there may be other folks who are useful sources for this. But that's when I do when others seem to like something and I'm just not feeling it. And of course there are only so many times you can give something a try before admitting that you can't force yourself to like it. For me that threshold is usually somewhere in the neighborhood of 5-7 listens.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ewok20t3
|
 |
« Reply #140 on: February 13, 2010, 09:12:38 PM » |
|
Try this. If after 2-3 listens, something isn't grabbing you and you have reason to expect it to grab you based on the artist's past performance, post here and ask others what they like about it. That might give you a few tracks to zero in on. Of course, we won't all agree here, and there may be other folks who are useful sources for this. But that's when I do when others seem to like something and I'm just not feeling it.
And of course there are only so many times you can give something a try before admitting that you can't force yourself to like it. For me that threshold is usually somewhere in the neighborhood of 5-7 listens.
That sounds like a good plan. I did listen to most of Birds & Cages today and it's starting to grow on me a little more. I listened to it on some different speakers and I noticed some good things that I hadn't noticed before in a few of the songs. I'm going to listen to it some more and see what happens. I never thought the album was bad or anything, I just thought it sounded too much like the first album, but with less memorable songs. As the songs are become more familiar to me, I think I'll like it more.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|