Same here, I really only became a fan in 06.
I became a fan in 2001, marginally speaking. 2003 to 2007 was more than half of the time I'd been a Radiohead fan when
In Rainbows was suddenly unleashed.
And as much as I would prefer a full length, I can see where Radiohead could feel limited by this. Maybe they don't want to write a bunch of songs that go well together.
I guess I consider this a pretty basic skill that any artist which aspires to be more than just a "singles" artist should possess. Plus, they've repeatedly insisted that an album like OKC where the songs all
do fit together and seem to build off of one another thematically is
not a concept album. Other albums like HTTT and IR had a pretty wide diversity of musical styles and lyrical themes; I can't think of one unifying idea or sound or characteristic that defines those albums, and for the most part I'm fine with that.
It could be liberating to create a song without having in the back of your mind, "Now how will this fit on the album?"
That pretty much describes
Amnesiac, I think. See, Radiohead? It's not that hard.
What I'm getting from this big announcement is really just that they've hit a case of writer's block and/or are struggling to work together as a band. That's fine; take some time off. If you need to record some hodgepodge material to get the kinks out, then do it - it's not like we haven't seen such things before on EPs or live bootlegs or what have you ("Nude" floated around for 10 years before it finally made the cut for an album) - but don't assume that you'll never ever ever do a full-length recording again. That's just plain shortsighted.
This situation sort of reminds me of when Coldplay said that they'd better break up after
A Rush of Blood to the Head because it was the best album they could possibly ever make. Man, they must feel stupid for saying that after they made
Viva la Vida. (Which I hope is
still not the best they could ever do.)