The Phorum
May 26, 2012, 07:54:26 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Spoon.
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register PhAQ  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Bono on Great Writers  (Read 320 times)
Josh
Administrator
Phorum Phenomenon
***********
Posts: 8782


Adventurer


View Profile
« on: July 15, 2003, 10:45:25 PM »

The man is a genius.

Quote
"Some of my favorite writers are clever with words. But the ones I go back to are the ones that are clever with ideas."
-Bono, 2001
Logged
DvChWi
Phorum Master
*********
Posts: 2317



View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: July 15, 2003, 11:00:21 PM »

True statement, but being clever with both certainly helps. Wink  
Logged

Fun facts about Chuck Norris:

Newton's Third Law is wrong: Although it states that for each action, there is an equal and opposite reaction, there is no force equal in reaction to a Chuck Norris roundhouse kick.

Chuck Norris can divide by zero.

Chuck Norris CAN believe it's not butter.
Vlad!
Mighty Armored Assault Duck
Administrator
Phorum Phenomenon
***********
Posts: 10696


I'm on a duck!


View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: July 16, 2003, 08:33:19 AM »

I like that sentiment as well. Although what DvChWi says is a good point, a good writer whose words are essentially empty is of less worth than a poor writer who speaks profound truths.

Not that well-written but empty words don't make for some good reading from time to time ;]
Logged

If you don’t have freedom as a principle, you can never see a reason not to make an exception. There are constantly going to be times when for one reason or another there’s some practical convenience in making an exception.
rms
Josh
Administrator
Phorum Phenomenon
***********
Posts: 8782


Adventurer


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: July 16, 2003, 09:42:43 AM »

I learned on The Cosby Show that "big words are for people with small minds."  laugh

See my sig. quote for more information.
Logged
DvChWi
Phorum Master
*********
Posts: 2317



View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: July 16, 2003, 10:54:36 AM »

Interestingly, this ties into my other thread about my friend who is "classics only."  He doesn't like that modern authors use smaller, more commom words more often.  He likes the authors who use as many different words as possible, to keep the text varied.  I think that Josh's sig accurately sums up my views on that.
« Last Edit: July 16, 2003, 10:55:10 AM by DvChWi » Logged

Fun facts about Chuck Norris:

Newton's Third Law is wrong: Although it states that for each action, there is an equal and opposite reaction, there is no force equal in reaction to a Chuck Norris roundhouse kick.

Chuck Norris can divide by zero.

Chuck Norris CAN believe it's not butter.
Vlad!
Mighty Armored Assault Duck
Administrator
Phorum Phenomenon
***********
Posts: 10696


I'm on a duck!


View Profile WWW
« Reply #5 on: July 16, 2003, 11:46:06 AM »

I like 'big words' (it may be more accurate to say 'obscure words,' since many common words are longer than many words that are considered 'big') because they are generally more precise than their smaller, commoner counterparts. However, the purpose of writing is to convey ideas and information. So just because the vocabulary of a certain book is more varied than that of a second book does not mean that the former is better or that the latter is worse, because maybe the first book is harder to understand or simply has a crappy plot.
Logged

If you don’t have freedom as a principle, you can never see a reason not to make an exception. There are constantly going to be times when for one reason or another there’s some practical convenience in making an exception.
rms
linds
Phorum Phriend
****
Posts: 358



View Profile WWW
« Reply #6 on: July 23, 2003, 12:39:04 PM »

bono is my hero.
i will drive, fly, or sail absolutely anywhere to see a u2 concert whenever they have a tour next.

(maybe not sail, though, as i don't know how.)
Logged

\"I saved Latin.  What did you ever do?\"
--Rushmore
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2006, Simple Machines